Financial Energy Review
BP is seeking to reverse course after nearly five years of pivoting toward low-carbon energy solutions. The British oil giant, which once aimed to transform itself into a renewable energy leader, is now looking to return to its roots as a major player in oil and gas production. This strategic shift comes as the company strives to revive its share price and allay investor concerns about future profits.
Once a poster child for energy transition, BP made headlines in 2020 when it outlined an ambitious plan to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels and pursue low-carbon technologies. However, a combination of external pressures—most notably the energy shock triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—and internal setbacks has prompted the company to reconsider its path. BP is now looking to invest billions back into oil and gas, signaling a significant retreat from its previous low-carbon ambitions.
BP’s Growth Story and Changing Focus
Under the leadership of CEO Murray Auchincloss, BP is focusing its efforts on high-return oil and gas projects. Among the most notable of these are new developments in the US Gulf Coast and the Middle East. According to company sources, BP is scaling back its low-carbon operations, halting 18 early-stage hydrogen projects and scaling down its wind and solar ventures. In fact, BP has already cut its hydrogen team in London by more than half, from over 80 staff to around 40.
“BP is making a calculated shift towards oil and gas to ensure our growth story is competitive with our peers,” said Auchincloss during a recent online town hall meeting with employees. “While we will continue to support low-carbon energy, we must prioritize high-return investments in oil and gas to secure our financial future.”
The decision to reduce the company’s focus on renewable energy projects follows disappointing returns from many of its clean energy investments. Offshore wind projects, in particular, have faced significant cost overruns, supply chain issues, and technical difficulties, making them less viable than initially expected. With global oil prices rising and energy security concerns in Europe exacerbated by the ongoing war in Ukraine, BP has found itself once again drawn to the more immediate financial rewards offered by fossil fuels.
Challenges Ahead: Skill Shortages and Employee Concerns
While BP accelerates its investment in oil and gas, some employees are questioning whether the company has the necessary expertise to restart its upstream operations. Since 2020, BP has made significant cuts to its workforce, particularly in the upstream division, and some worry that the company may no longer have enough experienced reservoir engineers and geologists to meet its new production goals.
“I’m concerned that BP doesn’t have the skilled workforce needed to push ahead with these new oil and gas projects,” said one employee, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “Many of us were laid off or reassigned during the transition to renewables, and now it feels like we’re being asked to ramp up production with fewer experienced people.”
These concerns were echoed in October, when employees peppered CEO Auchincloss with questions about the company’s ability to execute its new strategy. Auchincloss responded by emphasizing BP’s commitment to restoring its oil and gas output, but his assurances did little to quell the anxiety among some staff members.
“We are confident in our ability to execute on new oil and gas developments,” Auchincloss said during the town hall. “We’re bringing in the expertise we need and building a more agile workforce to help us deliver our goals.”
However, a BP spokesperson declined to comment on the specifics of the town hall discussion or the company’s ongoing recruitment efforts.
The Big Picture: Energy Transition and Competitor Movements
BP’s decision to refocus on oil and gas mirrors similar moves by rivals Shell and Equinor, both of which have dialed back their energy transition plans. Shell, in particular, has reduced its commitment to renewable energy, scaling back several offshore wind and hydrogen projects. CEO Wael Sawan has made it clear that Shell’s priority is to boost performance and shareholder returns, and that includes a more “ruthless” approach to cost-cutting and portfolio restructuring.
“There’s a need for a shift in strategy. We must focus on ensuring that the returns from our renewables projects align with the returns we are accustomed to from our oil and gas operations,” Sawan told Reuters in a recent interview. “It’s a balancing act, and we need to be realistic about what’s achievable.”
Similarly, Equinor, Europe’s largest supplier of natural gas since 2022, has launched a review of its low-carbon business. The company has scaled back its investment in early-stage projects and is focusing more on advanced offshore wind initiatives. According to an Equinor spokesperson, the company’s goal is to strengthen its competitiveness in anticipation of a recovery in the energy market.
“We are adapting to current market realities,” said the spokesperson. “We remain committed to a sustainable future, but we also need to ensure that we can compete effectively in the current energy environment.”
Despite these cutbacks, none of the companies have completely abandoned their renewable energy commitments. BP, Shell, and Equinor continue to pursue some of their existing wind and hydrogen projects and are focusing on areas such as biofuels, which offer quicker returns on investment. For BP, Auchincloss believes that hydrogen and offshore wind projects will still play a role in the company’s future, albeit in a more measured and strategic way.
The Road Ahead: A Balancing Act
The latest moves from BP, Shell, and Equinor have raised questions about the future of energy transition efforts across the industry. As analysts like Rohan Bowater from Accela Research point out, these companies are increasingly focused on boosting short-term profits through fossil fuel production. However, the long-term outlook for fossil fuels is far from certain, with growing pressure from electric vehicle adoption and climate change regulations.
“The transition to low-carbon energy is a marathon, not a sprint, but these companies need to balance shareholder demands for immediate returns with the need to invest in sustainable technologies,” Bowater said. “BP, in particular, finds itself in a difficult position, caught between its past as an oil and gas giant and its future as a cleaner energy company.”
Moreover, the global energy transition faces an uphill battle, as warnings grow that the world is on track to miss the UN-backed target to limit global warming to 1.5°C by the end of the century. As climate scientists and activists stress the need for urgent action, energy giants like BP may be forced to reconcile their short-term growth strategies with their long-term climate goals.
Despite these challenges, BP continues to maintain that its shift back to oil and gas is a temporary measure, one that will position the company to thrive as the energy sector recovers. Whether this strategy will prove successful in the long run, however, remains to be seen. What is clear is that BP and its competitors are entering a new phase of their evolution—one where the future of energy is as uncertain as ever.
—
